← Latest · Archive

SEV-3OpenAI
2 sources standard

OpenAI announced on 16 September 2025 that it will allow users aged 13–17 to access ChatGPT without parental consent in most jurisdictions, reversing its previous policy requiring guardian approval for minors [source].

The company stated that teens can now create accounts independently, with access to the same features as adult users including image generation, web browsing, and custom GPT creation. OpenAI cited research indicating that teens use AI tools for homework assistance, creative projects, and learning programming.

The policy change introduces new safety measures. Teen accounts will have memory features disabled by default, preventing ChatGPT from retaining conversation history across sessions. OpenAI also implemented additional content filters described as "more restrictive" for users under 18, though the company did not specify which categories of content would be blocked or how the filters differ from adult settings.

Parents retain the ability to request account deletion for their children by contacting OpenAI support. The company stated it will verify the relationship before processing such requests.

The announcement did not address how OpenAI will verify user ages during signup, nor whether existing mechanisms prevent minors from misrepresenting their birth dates. Age verification has been a persistent challenge for platforms offering AI services, with limited technical solutions available that balance privacy and accuracy.

OpenAI noted that the policy applies where legally permitted, acknowledging that some jurisdictions maintain stricter requirements for minors' online service access. The company did not provide a list of regions where parental consent remains mandatory.

The change takes effect immediately for new signups. Existing teen users who previously required parental approval will retain access under the new framework.

Why this is an AI incident

Launch-archive bulk classification (10 May 2026). Source signal originates from a real AI provider, regulator, or model-comparison probe; the harm or behavioural change described would not have occurred without the AI system being deployed in the role described. Editor reviewing the archive may amend the rationale per-wire.

Counterfactual "but-for" test per the Editor's Guide.

Codes M1, F10
Providers OpenAI